4.7 Review

2D Nanosheets-A New Class of Therapeutic Formulations against Cancer

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111803

关键词

2D material; nanosheets; MXene; black phosphorus; transition metal dichalcogenides; LDHs; drug delivery; therapeutics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers in cancer nanomedicine are exploring a revolutionary multifaceted carrier for treatment and diagnosis, resulting in the proposal of various drug cargos or magic bullets in this past decade. However, challenges prevent many nano-based complexes from entering the final stages and being accessible to patients. The use of 2D nanosheets, such as graphene, has generated extensive interest for biomedical applications due to their unique properties.
Researchers in cancer nanomedicine are exploring a revolutionary multifaceted carrier for treatment and diagnosis, resulting in the proposal of various drug cargos or magic bullets in this past decade. Even though different nano-based complexes are registered for clinical trials, very few products enter the final stages each year because of various issues. This prevents the formulations from entering the market and being accessible to patients. In the search for novel materials, the exploitation of 2D nanosheets, including but not limited to the highly acclaimed graphene, has created extensive interest for biomedical applications. A unique set of properties often characterize 2D materials, including semiconductivity, high surface area, and their chemical nature, which allow simple decoration and functionalization procedures, structures with high stability and targeting properties, vectors for controlled and sustained release of drugs, and materials for thermal-based therapies. This review discusses the challenges and opportunities of recently discovered 2D nanosheets for cancer therapeutics, with special attention paid to the most promising design technologies and their potential for clinical translation in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据