4.7 Article

Design of Oral Sustained-Release Pellets by Modeling and Simulation Approach to Improve Compliance for Repurposing Sobrerol

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010167

关键词

sobrerol; multiple sclerosis; sustained-release; pellets; modeling and simulation; dissolution; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; IVIVC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a recent study, oral mucolytic agent Sobrerol showed promise for treating multiple sclerosis. By developing sustained-release pellets, the frequency of administration and daily dose were successfully reduced, improving compliance and therapeutic efficacy.
Sobrerol, an oral mucolytic agent, in a recent study showed promise for treating multiple sclerosis. A human equivalent dose of 486 mg of sobrerol administered thrice daily (i.e., 1459 mg of daily dose) demonstrated the highest therapeutic efficacy for repurposing use, which also points out the poor compliance of administration. In this study, oral sustained-release pellets of sobrerol were successfully developed with evaluated manufacturing conditions and drug release kinetics. For design of the target drug product, we used a modeling and simulation approach to establish a predictive model of oral pharmacokinetic profile, by exploring the characteristics and correlations corresponding to the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sobrerol, such as absorption lag time (0.18 h), time-scaling in vitro-in vivo correlation (t(in-vitro) = 0.494 t(in-vivo) - 0.0904), gastrointestinal transit time (8 h), minimum effective concentration (1.61 mu g/mL), and duration of action (12.8 h). Results showed that the frequency of administration and the daily dose remarkably reduced by 33.3% (i.e., from thrice to twice daily) and 22.8%, respectively, which indicates that this prototype approach can be adopted for rapidly developing a modified-release dosage form of sobrerol, with improvement of compliance of administration and therapeutic efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据