4.7 Article

Key reaction components affect the kinetics and performance robustness of cell-free protein synthesis reactions

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.12.013

关键词

Automation; Cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS); Design of Experiments (DoE); Robustness; Statistical engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of 20 components of a popular cell-free protein synthesis reaction buffer on protein yield, reaction rate, and reaction longevity through experimental design and statistical analysis. The results show that a novel reaction buffer outperforms the reference buffer and significantly reduces reaction failures.
Cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) reactions have grown in popularity with particular interest in applications such as gene construct prototyping, biosensor technologies and the production of proteins with novel chemistry. Work has frequently focussed on optimising CFPS protocols for improving protein yield, reducing cost, or developing streamlined production protocols. Here we describe a statistical Design of Experiments analysis of 20 components of a popular CFPS reaction buffer. We simultaneously identify factors and factor interactions that impact on protein yield, rate of reaction, lag time and reaction longevity. This systematic experimental approach enables the creation of a statistical model capturing multiple behaviours of CFPS reactions in response to components and their interactions. We show that a novel reaction buffer outperforms the reference reaction by 400% and importantly reduces failures in CFPS across batches of cell lysates, strains of E. coli, and in the synthesis of different proteins. Detailed and quantitative understanding of how reaction components affect kinetic responses and robustness is imperative for future deployment of cell-free technologies.(c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据