4.6 Review

Effect of HIPEC on Peritoneal Recurrence in Peritoneal Metastasis Treated With Cytoreductive Surgery: A Systematic Review

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.795390

关键词

peritoneal metastasis; cytoreductive surgery; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC); recurrence; gastric; ovarian; colorectal

类别

资金

  1. NCCS Cancer Fund
  2. SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medicine Centre
  3. Singapore Gastric Cancer Consortium
  4. National Medical Research Council Open Fund-Large Collaborative Grant [OFLCG18May-0023]
  5. National Research Council Transition Award [NMRC/TA/0061/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of HIPEC in improving peritoneal recurrence rates in PM of different origins. Results showed good effectiveness of HIPEC in gastric PM, but limited utility in ovarian and colorectal PM. Findings were limited by a lack of data, lack of homogeneity, and consideration of novel and personalized treatment regimens.
Background: Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a late-stage manifestation of intra-abdominal malignancies. The current standard of care indicates that cure can only be achieved with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) which is often indicated with concurrent adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, the utility of HIPEC within subsets of PM is not fully understood. We seek to compare the effectiveness of HIPEC in improving peritoneal recurrence rates in PM of different origins. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of trials on the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, last searched in August 2021. Biases were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials as well as the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) framework. Results: 7 gastric PM studies, 3 ovarian PM studies, and 3 colorectal PM studies were included. Recurrence-free survival was improved in the HIPEC + CRS cohort in 5 gastric trials but only 1 ovarian trial and none of colorectal origin. Discussion: Our findings indicate decent effectiveness of HIPEC in gastric PM, but limited utility in ovarian and colorectal PM. Limitations in the current literature are attributed to the paucity of data available, a lack of homogeneity and consideration of novel and personalised treatment regimens. We implore for further studies to be conducted with a focus on patient selection and stratification, and suggest a reframing of approach towards modern molecular and targeted therapeutic options in future studies of HIPEC. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analyses/registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analysesdetails/60c1ffff0c1b78001e8efbe3/, identifier reviewregistry1166.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据