期刊
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.719466
关键词
mandibular reconstruction; virtual surgical planning; template-guided surgery; 3D printing; deviation analyses
类别
Mandibular reconstruction using virtual planning and personalized CORPPP-guided templates offers higher predictability, convenience, and accuracy compared to conventional freehand surgeries. However, more clinical cases are needed for further dimensional deviation analysis. The application and exploration of clinical practice will continue to improve template design.
Background Computer-assisted and template-guided mandibular reconstruction provides higher accuracy and less variation than conventional freehand surgeries. The combined osteotomy and reconstruction pre-shaped plate position (CORPPP) technique is a reliable choice for mandibular reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CORPPP-guided fibular flap mandibular reconstruction and analyze the possible causes of the deviations. Patients and Methods From June 2015 to December 2016, 28 patients underwent fibular flap mandibular reconstruction. Virtual planning and personalized CORPPP-guided templates were applied in 15 patients while 13 patients received conventional freehand surgeries. Deviations during mandibulectomy and fibular osteotomy, and overall and triaxial deviation of the corresponding mandibular anatomical landmarks were measured by superimposing the pre- and postoperative virtual models. Results The deviation of the resection line and resection angle was 1.23 +/- 0.98 mm and 4.11 degrees +/- 2.60 degrees. The actual length of fibula segments was longer than the designed length in 7 cases (mean: 0.35 +/- 0.32 mm) and shorter in 22 cases (mean: 1.53 +/- 1.19 mm). In patients without ramus reconstruction, deviations of the ipsilateral condylar head point (Co.), gonion point (Go.), and coracoid process point (Cor.) were 6.71 +/- 3.42 mm, 5.38 +/- 1.71 mm, and 11.05 +/- 3.24 mm in the freehand group and 1.73 +/- 1.13 mm, 1.86 +/- 0.96 mm, and 2.54 +/- 0.50 mm in the CORPPP group, respectively, with significant statistical differences (p < 0.05). In patients with ramus reconstruction, deviations of ipsilateral Co. and Go. were 9.79 +/- 4.74 mm vs. 3.57 +/- 1.62 mm (p < 0.05), and 15.17 +/- 6.53 mm vs. 4.36 +/- 1.68 mm (p < 0.05) in the freehand group and CORPPP group, respectively. Conclusion Mandibular reconstructions employing virtual planning and personalized CORPPP-guided templates show significantly higher predictability, convenience, and accuracy of mandibular reconstruction compared with conventional freehand surgeries. However, more clinical cases were required for further dimensional deviation analysis. The application and exploration of clinical practice would also continuously improve the design of templates.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据