4.6 Review

Developmental Pathways Underlying Lung Development and Congenital Lung Disorders

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10112987

关键词

congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM); bronchopulmonary sequestration; bronchogenic cysts; congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH); congenital malformations

资金

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [UIDB/50026/2020, UIDP/50026/2020]
  2. FCT , Inter-University Doctoral Programme in Ageing and Chronic Disease (PhDOC) [PD/BD/137655/2018]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/137655/2018] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung organogenesis is a highly coordinated process regulated by a network of signaling pathways, which determine the formation of a functional organ. Abnormalities such as bronchial malformations can affect lung function. This review focuses on uncovering the molecular mechanisms underlying normal/abnormal lung growth and development and their impact on postnatal survival.
Lung organogenesis is a highly coordinated process governed by a network of conserved signaling pathways that ultimately control patterning, growth, and differentiation. This rigorously regulated developmental process culminates with the formation of a fully functional organ. Conversely, failure to correctly regulate this intricate series of events results in severe abnormalities that may compromise postnatal survival or affect/disrupt lung function through early life and adulthood. Conditions like congenital pulmonary airway malformation, bronchopulmonary sequestration, bronchogenic cysts, and congenital diaphragmatic hernia display unique forms of lung abnormalities. The etiology of these disorders is not yet completely understood; however, specific developmental pathways have already been reported as deregulated. In this sense, this review focuses on the molecular mechanisms that contribute to normal/abnormal lung growth and development and their impact on postnatal survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据