4.6 Article

T-Bet Deficiency Attenuates Bile Duct Injury in Experimental Biliary Atresia

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10123461

关键词

cholestasis; bile duct; STAT1; RRV; T-bet

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 DK-091566]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biliary atresia is an obstructive neonatal cholangiopathy leading to liver cirrhosis and end stage liver disease. The transcription factor T-bet plays a critical role in the progression of BA. Analysis showed that T-bet knockout mice had decreased inflammatory response and altered immune cell profile compared to wild-type mice when infected with RRV, indicating the importance of T-bet in the disease.
Biliary atresia (BA) is an obstructive neonatal cholangiopathy leading to liver cirrhosis and end stage liver disease. A Kasai portoenterostomy may restore biliary drainage, but most patients ultimately require liver transplantation for survival. At diagnosis, immune cells within the liver of patients with BA demonstrate a T-helper 1 (Th1) inflammatory profile similar to rhesus rotavirus (RRV)-infected mice livers developing BA. The transcription factor Tbx21 (T-bet) is essential for induction of a Th1 immune response in both the adaptive and innate immune system. Here we used animals with targeted deletion of the T-bet gene to determine its role in the progression of BA. Infection of newborn T-bet knockout (KO) pups with RRV resulted in a decreased Th1 inflammatory chemokine/cytokine profile when compared to infected wild-type mice. Analysis of the mononuclear cells profile from T-bet KO mice revealed both a significant decrease in the total number of CD3, CD4, and CD8 T cells and their effector molecules granzyme A, perforin, and FasL. Even though the percentage of T-bet KO mice displaying symptoms of an obstructive cholangiopathy and overall mortality rate was not different compared to wild-type mice, the extrahepatic bile ducts of T-bet KO mice remained patent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据