4.6 Article

Transcriptional Profiles of Cell Fate Transitions Reveal Early Drivers of Neuronal Apoptosis and Survival

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10113238

关键词

apoptosis; neurotrophic factors; survival; transcriptional analysis; drug targets; drug repurposing; functional enrichment; regulatory network; disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuronal apoptosis and survival are regulated at the transcriptional level. By studying the key genes and regulatory factors involved in these processes, a core set of 175 genes showing opposite expression trends at the intersection of apoptosis and survival was identified. Transcription regulatory network analysis revealed the action of nine upstream transcription factors, with five of them potentially serving as drug targets.
Neuronal apoptosis and survival are regulated at the transcriptional level. To identify key genes and upstream regulators primarily responsible for these processes, we overlayed the temporal transcriptome of cerebellar granule neurons following induction of apoptosis and their rescue by three different neurotrophic factors. We identified a core set of 175 genes showing opposite expression trends at the intersection of apoptosis and survival. Their functional annotations and expression signatures significantly correlated to neurological, psychiatric and oncological disorders. Transcription regulatory network analysis revealed the action of nine upstream transcription factors, converging pro-apoptosis and pro-survival-inducing signals in a highly interconnected functionally and temporally ordered manner. Five of these transcription factors are potential drug targets. Transcriptome-based computational drug repurposing produced a list of drug candidates that may revert the apoptotic core set signature. Besides elucidating early drivers of neuronal apoptosis and survival, our systems biology-based perspective paves the way to innovative pharmacology focused on upstream targets and regulatory networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据