4.6 Review

The Role of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) in the Control of Neuroendocrine Regulation of Growth

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10102664

关键词

IGF-1 singalling; growth hormone; GHRH; energy expenditure; adipose tissues physiology

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation [U01HD086838-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neuroendocrine system in mammals plays a crucial role in regulating body growth and cellular metabolism through the communication between the hypothalamus and pituitary. Growth hormone (GH) is considered the master regulator of somatic development and is involved in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism via well-defined signaling pathways. The role of IGF-1 in regulating the GH-axis for somatic growth and metabolic homeostasis is essential for maintaining physiological functions.
In mammals, the neuroendocrine system, which includes the communication between the hypothalamus and the pituitary, plays a major role in controlling body growth and cellular metabolism. GH produced from the pituitary somatotroph is considered the master regulator of somatic development and involved, directly and indirectly, in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism via complex, yet well-defined, signaling pathways. GH production from the pituitary gland is primarily regulated by the counter-regulatory effects of the hypothalamic GHRH and SST hormones. The role of IGF-1 feedback regulation in GH production has been demonstrated by pharmacologic interventions and in genetically modified mouse models. In the present review, we discuss the role of IGF-1 in the regulation of the GH-axis as it controls somatic growth and metabolic homeostasis. We present genetically modified mouse models that maintain the integrity of the GH/GHRH-axis with the single exception of IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) deficiency in the hypothalamic GHRH neurons and somatotroph that reveals a novel mechanism controlling adipose tissues physiology and energy expenditure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据