4.6 Review

miRNAs as Biomarkers and Possible Therapeutic Strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis

期刊

CELLS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11030452

关键词

rheumatoid arthritis (RA); immune and inflammatory responses; bone destruction; synovial hyperplasia; microRNA; autoimmune disease

资金

  1. Polish National Science Center [2015/19/B/NZ5/00247]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, there has been increasing attention on the epigenetic dysregulation in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. MicroRNAs (miRNA) have been identified as key regulators of immune cell development and function, and could potentially serve as biomarkers for RA diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.
Within the past years, more and more attention has been devoted to the epigenetic dysregulation that provides an additional window for understanding the possible mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous disease where a specific immunologic and genetic/epigenetic background is responsible for disease manifestations and course. In this field, microRNAs (miRNA; miR) are being identified as key regulators of immune cell development and function. The identification of disease-associated miRNAs will introduce us to the post-genomic era, providing the real probability of manipulating the genetic impact of autoimmune diseases. Thereby, different miRNAs may be good candidates for biomarkers in disease diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and other clinical applications. Here, we outline not only the role of miRNAs in immune and inflammatory responses in RA, but also present miRNAs as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers. Research into miRNAs is still in its infancy; however, investigation into these novel biomarkers could progress the use of personalized medicine in RA treatment. Finally, we discussed the possibility of miRNA-based therapy in RA patients, which holds promise, given major advances in the therapy of patients with inflammatory arthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据