4.6 Article

The Anti-Tumoral Potential of Phosphonate Analog of Sulforaphane in Zebrafish Xenograft Model

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10113219

关键词

zebrafish; isothiocyanates; glioblastoma; cervical cancer; breast cancer; toxicology; zebrafish xenograft model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the phosphonate analog P-ITC can be used as a non-toxic treatment for zebrafish embryos and also shows anti-cancerogenic effects on various human tumor cell lines. Experimental results demonstrate that P-ITC significantly inhibits cancer cell growth, displaying versatile activity.
Isothiocyanates (ITCs) show strong activity against numerous human tumors. Five structurally diverse ITCs were tested in vivo using the zebrafish embryos 6 and 48 h post-fertilization (hpf). The survival rate, hatching time, and gross morphological changes were assessed 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment with all compounds in various doses (1-10 mu M). As a result, we selected a phosphonate analog of sulforaphane (P-ITC; 1-3 mu M) as a non-toxic treatment for zebrafish embryos, both 6 and 48 hpf. Furthermore, the in vivo anti-cancerogenic studies with selected 3 mu M P-ITC were performed using a set of cell lines derived from the brain (U87), cervical (HeLa), and breast (MDA-MB-231) tumors. For the experiment, cells were labeled using red fluorescence dye Dil (1,1 & PRIME;-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3 & PRIME;,3 & PRIME;-Tetramethylindocarbocyanine, 10 mu g/mL) and injected into the hindbrain ventricle, yolk sac region and Cuvier duct of zebrafish embryos. The tumor size measurement after 48 h of treatment demonstrated the significant inhibition of cancer cell growth in all tested cases by P-ITC compared to the non-treated controls. Our studies provided evidence for P-ITC anti-cancerogenic properties with versatile activity against different cancer types. Additionally, P-ITC demonstrated the safety of use in the living organism at various stages of embryogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据