4.6 Article

The Motility and Mesenchymal Features of Breast Cancer Cells Correlate with the Levels and Intracellular Localization of Transglutaminase Type 2

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10113059

关键词

transglutaminase type 2; breast cancer; motility; EMT; NC9

资金

  1. FAR2020 [prot. FAR2057432]
  2. FAR2021 [prot. FAR2191074]
  3. FAR2020
  4. FAR2021

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that exposure to Doxorubicin (Dox) can increase TG2 levels in breast cancer cell lines and promote cell motility, while the TG2 inhibitor NC9 can reduce cell migration. The physical interaction between TG2 and the cytoskeletal component vimentin plays a crucial role in drug-treated cells.
We have investigated motility in breast cancer cell lines in association with the expression of Transglutaminase type 2 (TG2) as well as upon the administration of Doxorubicin (Dox), an active cytotoxic agent that is employed in chemotherapy. The exposure of MCF-7 cells to the drug increased TG2 levels, triggering epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), thereby supporting cell motility. The effects of Dox on the movement of MCF-7 cells were counteracted by treatment with NC9, a TG2 inhibitor, which induced morphological changes and also reduced the migration of MDA-MB-231 cells exhibiting high levels of TG2. The physical association of TG2 with the cytoskeletal component vimentin appeared pivotal both in drug-treated MCF-7 and in MDA-MB-231 cells and seemed to be independent of the catalytic activity of TG2. NC9 altered the subcellular distribution of TG2 and, consequently, the co-localization of TG2 with vimentin. Furthermore, NC9 induced a nuclear accumulation of TG2 as a prelude to TG2-dependent gene expression modifications. Since enzyme activity can affect both motility and nuclear functions, targeting of this protein could represent a method to improve therapeutic interventions in breast tumors, particularly those to control progression and to limit drug resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据