4.6 Review

Vitamin D and the Risk of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on Behalf of the Italian Melanoma Intergroup

期刊

CANCERS
卷 13, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194815

关键词

vitamin D; dietary intake; blood concentration; gene polymorphism; vitamin D receptor; vitamin D binding protein; non-melanoma skin cancer; basal cell cancer; squamous cell cancer; risk

类别

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study provided a comprehensive overview of the link between vitamin D and non-melanoma skin cancer, indicating a suggestive association between vitamin D intake and blood concentration with NMSC risk, while no significant association was found between polymorphisms of VDR and VDBP genes and NMSC risk.
We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the link between vitamin D and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). For this purpose, we conducted a systematic literature review (updated to 3 February 2021) and meta-analysis of the studies reporting on the association between vitamin D intake (from diet and supplements) and blood concentration, polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) genes, and the risk of NMSC. Random effects meta-analysis models were fitted to merge study-specific risk estimates into summary relative risk (SRR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Twenty-four studies altogether were included. There was a suggestive association between increasing serum/plasma vitamin D concentration and NMSC risk (SRR for highest vs. lowest concentration 1.67, 95%CI 0.61-4.56), although with large heterogeneity across studies (I-2 = 91%). NMSC risk was associated with highest vitamin D intake in observational studies but not in clinical trials. Finally, there was no significant association between any polymorphism of the VDR and VDBP genes and NMSC risk. In conclusion, no strong relationship between vitamin D metabolism and NMSC risk appears to exist according to our systematic review and meta-analysis, although some findings are worthy of further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据