4.6 Article

Spatial Metrics of Interaction between CD163-Positive Macrophages and Cancer Cells and Progression-Free Survival in Chemo-Treated Breast Cancer

期刊

CANCERS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020308

关键词

tumor-associated macrophages; cancer biomarkers; tumor immune microenvironment; spatially-resolved immunohistochemistry data; marked point patterns; nearest neighbor distance; microscopic image analysis; quantitative pathology; spatial interactions; breast cancer

类别

资金

  1. NCI [R01CA222847, R01CA164225, R01CA223804]
  2. DOD [W81XWH1910356, W81XWH1910357, W81XWH-21-0003]
  3. MCWCC Institutional Research Grant [14-247-29]
  4. Susan G. Komen Foundation [KG091116]
  5. American Cancer Society (RSG)
  6. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W81XWH1910357, W81XWH1910356] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The density and spatial relationship of CD163(+) TAMs in tumor tissue are associated with unfavorable prognosis in breast cancer.
Simple Summary: A majority of breast cancer deaths are caused by aggressive molecular subtypes that are at high risk of progression. Patients with high-risk breast cancer commonly receive first-line systemic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy exerts direct cytotoxic effects on proliferating cancer cells. In addition, significant effects of chemotherapy are mediated through immune-boosting anti-cancer mechanisms that counteract immunosuppressive tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential prognostic value of the prevalence and the spatial localization of CD163(+) TAMs in tumor tissue from breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy after surgery. We developed a novel algorithm that identifies CD163(+) TAMs in an objective manner and quantifies spatial interactions between CD163(+) TAMs and cancer cells using distance-based metrics. Our results demonstrate that close spatial proximity of CD163(+) TAMs to cancer cells and the average number of CD163(+) cells either directly adjacent to or within communicating distance of each cancer cell are independent predictors of unfavorable prognosis in breast cancer.Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) promote progression of breast cancer and other solid malignancies via immunosuppressive, pro-angiogenic and pro-metastatic effects. Tumor-promoting TAMs tend to express M2-like macrophage markers, including CD163. Histopathological assessments suggest that the density of CD163-positive TAMs within the tumor microenvironment is associated with reduced efficacy of chemotherapy and unfavorable prognosis. However, previous analyses have required research-oriented pathologists to visually enumerate CD163(+) TAMs, which is both laborious and subjective and hampers clinical implementation. Objective, operator-independent image analysis methods to quantify TAM-associated information are needed. In addition, since M2-like TAMs exert local effects on cancer cells through direct juxtacrine cell-to-cell interactions, paracrine signaling, and metabolic factors, we hypothesized that spatial metrics of adjacency of M2-like TAMs to breast cancer cells will have further information value. Immunofluorescence histo-cytometry of CD163(+) TAMs was performed retrospectively on tumor microarrays of 443 cases of invasive breast cancer from patients who subsequently received adjuvant chemotherapy. An objective and automated algorithm was developed to phenotype CD163(+) TAMs and calculate their density within the tumor stroma and derive several spatial metrics of interaction with cancer cells. Shorter progression-free survival was associated with a high density of CD163(+) TAMs, shorter median cancer-to-CD163(+) nearest neighbor distance, and a high number of either directly adjacent CD163(+) TAMs (within juxtacrine proximity < 12 mu m to cancer cells) or communicating CD163(+) TAMs (within paracrine communication distance < 250 mu m to cancer cells) after multivariable adjustment for clinical and pathological risk factors and correction for optimistic bias due to dichotomization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据