4.6 Article

High Expression of PPM1D Induces Tumors Phenotypically Similar to TP53 Loss-of-Function Mutations in Mice

期刊

CANCERS
卷 13, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215493

关键词

PPM1D; p53; genetically engineered mouse model; adenocarcinoma; lymphoma; neuroblastoma

类别

资金

  1. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  4. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  5. Karolinska Institutet
  6. Maerta and Gunnar V Philipson Foundation
  7. Cancer Research Foundations of Radiumhemmet
  8. Swedish Cancer Foundation [CAN2018/460]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overexpression of PPM1D in mice leads to a variety of cancers, with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma being the most common. These tumors show similarities in phenotype and genetics to tumors in mice with dysfunctional p53.
PPM1D is a negative regulator of p53 and genomic aberrations resulting in increased activity of PPM1D have been observed in cancers of different origins, indicating that PPM1D has oncogenic properties. We established a transgenic mouse model overexpressing PPM1D and showed that these mice developed a wide variety of cancers. PPM1D-expressing mice developed tumors phenotypically and genetically similar to tumors in mice with dysfunctional p53. T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma was the most frequent cancer observed in these mice (55%) followed by adenocarcinomas (24%), leukemia (12%) and other solid tumors including neuroblastoma. Characterization of T-cell lymphomas in mice overexpressing PPM1D demonstrates Pten-deletion and p53-accumulation similar to mice with p53 loss-of-function. Also, Notch1 mutations which are recurrently observed in T-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-ALL) were frequently detected in PPM1D-transgenic mice. Hence, PPM1D acts as an oncogenic driver in connection with cellular stress, suggesting that the PPM1D gene status and expression levels should be investigated in TP53 wild-type tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据