4.6 Article

FDG-PET/CT in Lymphoma: Where Do We Go Now?

期刊

CANCERS
卷 13, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205222

关键词

FDG-PET; lymphomas; Deauville 5PS

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article focuses on the role and current applications of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography in managing lymphoma patients. It discusses potential future directions of innovative metabolic metrics and new radiopharmaceuticals, and highlights the importance of PET in personalized medicine approaches for lymphoma treatment.
We focus on the role and current applications of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography in the management of lymphoma patients through improved staging or treatment response assessment or through early PET-driven therapeutic strategies, leading the way to a novel area of personalized medicine, optimizing disease control and toxicity. We discuss the potential future directions of innovative metabolic metrics that are being developed, notably to assess response to new immunotherapy regimens and to provide an improved prognostic factor for predicting patients' survival. Finally, we present new radiopharmaceuticals developed following the identification of pathways or specific receptors in lymphomas, providing great opportunities for molecular imaging in treatment evaluation and management. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is an essential part of the management of patients with lymphoma at staging and response evaluation. Efforts to standardize PET acquisition and reporting, including the 5-point Deauville scale, have enabled PET to become a surrogate for treatment success or failure in common lymphoma subtypes. This review summarizes the key clinical-trial evidence that supports PET-directed personalized approaches in lymphoma but also points out the potential place of innovative PET/CT metrics or new radiopharmaceuticals in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据