4.7 Article

The Impact of Modifying Sunitinib Treatment Scheduling on Renal Cancer Tumor Biology and Resistance

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020369

关键词

renal cell carcinoma; sunitinib; resistance; treatment scheduling

资金

  1. Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada
  2. Canadian Urology Oncology group (KCRNC/CUOG) research trainee award
  3. Ontario Institute of Cancer Research [RFTP-004]
  4. Ontario Molecular Pathology Research Network [CPTRG-004]
  5. Kidney Foundation of Canada [KFOC180018]
  6. Canadian Institution of Health Research [PJT 162304]
  7. Kidney Foundation of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resistance to sunitinib treatment is a common issue in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and individualizing treatment protocols could be the key to solving this problem. Through experiments, it was discovered that alternative treatment schedules could delay cancer progression and result in distinct morphological changes in the tumor compared to traditional treatment schedules.
With sunitinib treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, most patients end up developing resistance over time. Recent clinical trials have shown that individualizing treatment protocols could delay resistance and result in better outcomes. We developed an in vivo xenograft tumor model and compared tumor growth rate, morphological, and transcriptomic differences between alternative and traditional treatment schedules. Our results show that the alternative treatment regime could delay/postpone cancer progression. Additionally, we identified distinct morphological changes in the tumor with alternative and traditional treatments, likely due to the significantly dysregulated signaling pathways between the protocols. Further investigation of the signaling pathways underlying these morphological changes may lead potential therapeutic targets to be used in a combined treatment with sunitinib, which offers promise in postponing/reversing the resistance of sunitinib.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据