4.7 Article

Reproductive, Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes in Women with Congenital Uterine Anomalies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214797

关键词

congenital uterine anomalies; fertility; miscarriage; obstetric outcome; neonatal outcome

资金

  1. Yonsei University College of Medicine [6-2013-0183]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Women with congenital uterine anomalies have lower live birth rates and higher risks of miscarriage, preterm birth, malpresentation, cesarean section, and placental abruption. Canalization defects are associated with poor reproductive performance in early pregnancy, while unification defects impact obstetric and neonatal outcomes throughout pregnancy.
Congenital uterine anomalies (CUA) may influence reproductive performance, resulting in adverse pregnancy associated complications. This study aimed to assess the association of CUA subtypes with reproductive, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes. We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries for studies comparing pregnancy outcomes between women with CUA and those with a normal uterus. The random effects model was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Women with CUA had a lower rate of live births (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.33-0.69), and a higher rate of first trimester miscarriage (OR, 1.79; 95% CI 1.34-2.4), second trimester miscarriage (OR 2.92; 95% CI 1.35-6.32), preterm birth (OR 2.98; 95% CI 2.43-3.65), malpresentation (OR 9.1; 95% CI 5.88-14.08), cesarean section (OR 2.87; 95% CI 1.56-5.26), and placental abruption (OR 3.12; 95% CI 1.58-6.18). Women with canalization defects appear to have the poorest reproductive performance during early pregnancy. However, unification defects were associated with obstetric and neonatal outcomes throughout the course of pregnancy. It may be beneficial for clinicians to advise on potential complications that may be increased depending on the type and severity of CUA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据