Fibrosis Burden of Missed and Added Populations According to the New Definition of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver

Recently, the classification of fatty liver and the definition for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have been challenged. Herein, we aim to evaluate the burden of hepatic fibrosis in the missed and added populations following the proposal of the new definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver (MAFLD) in a health check-up cohort. A total of 6775 subjects underwent both magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and an abdominal ultrasound at 13 nationwide health check-up centers in Korea. Significant and advanced hepatic fibrosis was defined as & GE;3.0 kPa and & GE;3.6 kPa in the MRE test, respectively. The prevalence of sonographic fatty liver (FL) was 47.4%. Among the subjects with sonographic FL, 77.3% and 94% are compatible with NAFLD and with the new MAFLD definitions, respectively. Moreover, 72% of FL cases belong to both the NAFLD and MAFLD definitions, whereas 1.4% is compatible with neither. The population compatible with the MAFLD definition has the following coexisting liver diseases: alcohol-related (71.9%), hepatitis B (23.9%), hepatitis C (0.4%), and both alcohol and viral hepatitis (2.8%). The prevalence of significant and advanced hepatic fibrosis is considerable in the MAFLD-only group. However, the prevalence of significant and advanced hepatic fibrosis is similar in the NAFLD-only group, and neither the NAFLD nor MAFLD group compared to healthy controls. The added population (MAFLD-only group), according to the new MAFLD definition, has a higher metabolic and fibrosis burden when compared to those in the missed population (NAFLD-only group).

Automated summary

With the proposal of the new MAFLD definition, the added population (MAFLD-only group) shows a higher metabolic and fibrosis burden compared to those in the missed population (NAFLD-only group).