4.7 Article

Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygenation on Blood Cytokines and Arginine Derivatives; No Evidence for Induction of Inflammation or Endothelial Injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235488

关键词

ADMA; SDMA; cytokines; hyperbaric oxygenation; HBOT

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [UMO-2017/25/B/NZ5/02949]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While differences were observed in ADMA, arginine derivatives, and cytokine concentrations among patient groups, HBOT did not have any significant effect on these parameters, suggesting its neutral impact on inflammation and endothelial injury.
(1) Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) uses 100% oxygen delivered at 1.5-3 times the atmospheric pressure in a specialised chamber to achieve supraphysiological oxygen tension in blood and tissues. Besides its target, HBOT may affect inflammation, endothelial function or angiogenesis. This study analysed the effect of HBOT on blood concentrations of factors that may affect these processes in patients with necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTI), aseptic bone necrosis (ABN) and idiopathic sudden sensory neural hearing loss (ISSNHL). (2) Methods: Concentrations asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and other arginine derivatives were measured with liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, whereas ELISA was used to quantitate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and cytokines (IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TGF-beta) before and after HBOT in 80 patients (NSTI n = 21, ISSNHL n = 53, ABN n = 6). (3) Results: While some differences were noted between patient groups in ADMA and other arginine derivatives as well as in cytokine concentrations, HBOT did not affect any of these parameters. (4) Conclusions: While cytokines and arginine derivatives concentrations were modified by underlying pathology, hyperbaric oxygenation did not immediately modify it suggesting that it is neutral for inflammation and is not inducing endothelial injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据