4.7 Article

An alternating current heating method for lithium-ion batteries from subzero temperatures

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 13, 页码 1869-1883

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/er.3576

关键词

lithium-ion battery; low temperature; alternating current; heating method; impedance; electric vehicle

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51576142]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (SRFDP) [20130072110055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An alternating current (AC) heating method for lithium-ion batteries is proposed in the paper. Effects of current frequency, amplitudes and waveforms on the temperature evolution and battery performance degradation are respectively investigated. First, a thermal model is established to depict the heat generation rate and temperature status, whose parameters are calibrated from the AC impedance measurements under different current amplitudes and considering battery safe operating voltage limits. Further experiments with different current amplitudes, frequencies and waveforms on the 18650 batteries are conducted to validate the effectiveness of the AC heating. The experimental data recorded by appropriate measurement instrument are of great consistence with simulation results from the thermal model. At high frequency, the temperature rises prominently as the current increases, and high frequency serves as a good innovation to reduce the battery degradation. However, efficient temperature rise can be obtained from high impedance at low frequencies. Typically, 600 s is needed to heat up the battery from -24 degrees C to 7.79 degrees C with sinusoidal waveform and approximately from -24 degrees C to 25.6 degrees C with rectangular pulse waveform at 10A and 30 Hz. The model and experiments presented have shown potential value in battery thermal management studies for electric vehicle (EV)/hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) applications at subzero temperatures. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据