4.7 Review

Approved HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors in the past decade

期刊

ACTA PHARMACEUTICA SINICA B
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 1567-1590

出版社

INST MATERIA MEDICA, CHINESE ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.11.009

关键词

HIV treatment; HAART; NRTI; NNRTI; Clinical efficacy

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China (China) [31871324, 81730064, 31571368]
  2. Hunan Youth Elite Project (China) [2018RS3006]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project (China) [2018ZX10715004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides a comprehensive review of HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors approved in the past decade, including their drug discovery, pharmacology, and clinical efficacy. New inhibitors are also highlighted, and future development may focus on novel antiretroviral inhibitors with improved characteristics.
HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors are the important components of highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAARTs) for anti-HIV treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis in clinical practice. Many RT inhibitors and their combination regimens have been approved in the past ten years, but a review on their drug discovery, pharmacology, and clinical efficacy is lacking. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of RT inhibitors (tenofovir alafenamide, rilpivirine, doravirine, dapivirine, azvudine and elsulfavirine) approved in the past decade, regarding their drug discovery, pharmacology, and clinical efficacy in randomized controlled trials. Novel RT inhibitors such as islatravir, MK-8504, MK-8507, MK8583, IQP-0528, and MIV-150 will be also highlighted. Future development may focus on the new generation of novel antiretroviral inhibitors with higher bioavailability, longer elimination half-life, more favorable side-effect profiles, fewer drug-drug interactions, and higher activities against circulating drug-resistant strains. (C) 2022 Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据