4.8 Article

Predicting the inhibition efficiencies of magnesium dissolution modulators using sparse machine learning models

期刊

NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-021-00658-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Helmholtz Association
  2. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) [57511455]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (D.F.G., German Research Foundation) [192346071-SFB 986, 390794421-GRK 2462]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article proposes two systematic approaches for identifying molecular descriptors most relevant for the corrosion inhibition efficiency of chemical compounds using sparse feature selection, one based on analysis of variance and the other on random forests. Both combined with deep neural networks can predict the corrosion inhibition efficiencies, outperforming predictions relying on random selection of molecular descriptors. Autoencoders could be used in the future to enable even more accurate automated predictions of corrosion inhibition efficiencies.
The degradation behaviour of magnesium and its alloys can be tuned by small organic molecules. However, an automatic identification of effective organic additives within the vast chemical space of potential compounds needs sophisticated tools. Herein, we propose two systematic approaches of sparse feature selection for identifying molecular descriptors that are most relevant for the corrosion inhibition efficiency of chemical compounds. One is based on the classical statistical tool of analysis of variance, the other one based on random forests. We demonstrate how both can-when combined with deep neural networks-help to predict the corrosion inhibition efficiencies of chemical compounds for the magnesium alloy ZE41. In particular, we demonstrate that this framework outperforms predictions relying on a random selection of molecular descriptors. Finally, we point out how autoencoders could be used in the future to enable even more accurate automated predictions of corrosion inhibition efficiencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据