4.8 Article

Illusion of visual stability through active perceptual serial dependence

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abk2480

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [P2ELP3_158876]
  2. Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland [RIG009850]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA236793]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P2ELP3_158876] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the dynamic nature of the visual world, our perceptual experience remains stable over time. This study introduces a previously unknown visual illusion that provides direct evidence for an online mechanism that continuously smooths our perceptions. The findings suggest that past visual experiences up to 15 seconds ago can influence the appearance of objects, indicating a continuous merging of object representation over time. This illusion of stability is attributed to an underlying active mechanism of serial dependence in visual representations.
Despite a noisy and ever-changing visual world, our perceptual experience seems remarkably stable over time. How does our visual system achieve this apparent stability? Here, we introduce a previously unknown visual illusion that shows direct evidence for an online mechanism continuously smoothing our percepts over time. As a result, a continuously seen physically changing object can be misperceived as unchanging. We find that online object appearance is captured by past visual experience up to 15 seconds ago. We propose that, because of an underlying active mechanism of serial dependence, the representation of the object is continuously merged over time, and the consequence is an illusory stability in which object appearance is biased toward the past. Our results provide a direct demonstration of the link between serial dependence in visual representations and perceived visual stability in everyday life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据