4.8 Article

Estimating global biomass and biogeochemical cycling of marine fish with and without fishing

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 41, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd7554

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA [80NSSC17K0290, 80NSSC21K0420]
  2. California Department of Resources-Ocean Protection Council grant [C0100400]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the Maria de Maeztu Programme for Centres/Units of Excellence in RD [MDM-2015-0552]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [682602]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a data-constrained marine ecosystem model, the study estimated the historical reduction of fish biomass due to fishing and the associated change in biogeochemical cycling rates. The research found that the impact of fishing on global fish biomass and biogeochemical cycling rates is comparable to that of anthropogenic climate change.
The biomass and biogeochemical roles of fish in the ocean are ecologically important but poorly known. Here, we use a data-constrained marine ecosystem model to provide a first-order estimate of the historical reduction of fish biomass due to fishing and the associated change in biogeochemical cycling rates. The pre-exploitation global biomass of exploited fish (10 g to 100 kg) was 3.3 +/- 0.5 Gt, cycling roughly 2% of global primary production (9.4 +/- 1.6 Gt year(-1)) and producing 10% of surface biological export. Particulate organic matter produced by exploited fish drove roughly 10% of the oxygen consumption and biological carbon storage at depth. By the 1990s, biomass and cycling rates had been reduced by nearly half, suggesting that the biogeochemical impact of fisheries has been comparable to that of anthropogenic climate change. Our results highlight the importance of developing a better mechanistic understanding of how fish alter ocean biogeochemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据