4.8 Article

Fossil records of early solar irradiation and cosmolocation of the CAI factory: A reappraisal

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 40, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abg8329

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA Emerging Worlds grant [NNX16AD36G]
  2. LLNL [DE-AC5207NA27344, LLNL-JRNL-819045]
  3. NASA [80NSSC20K0759]
  4. NSF Instrumentation and Facilities program
  5. NASA [NNX16AD36G, 906726] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions in meteorites provide important information about the early Solar System environment. Variations in vanadium and strontium isotopes in CAIs suggest that kinetic isotope effects during condensation and evaporation can explain anomalies previously attributed to solar particle irradiation. Researchers also found initial excesses of Be-10 and argue that CAIs likely formed at greater heliocentric distances than previously thought.
Calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs) in meteorites carry crucial information about the environmental conditions of the nascent Solar System prior to planet formation. Based on models of 50V-Be-10 co-production by in-situ irradiation, CAIs are considered to have formed within similar to 0.1 AU from the proto-Sun. Here, we present vanadium (V) and strontium (Sr) isotopic co-variations in fine- and coarse-grained CAIs and demonstrate that kinetic isotope effects during partial condensation and evaporation best explain V isotope anomalies previously attributed to solar particle irradiation. We also report initial excesses of Be-10 and argue that CV CAIs possess essentially a homogeneous level of Be-10, inherited during their formation. Based on numerical modeling of 50V-Be-1(0) co-production by irradiation, we show that CAI formation during protoplanetary disk build-up likely occurred at greater heliocentric distances than previously considered, up to planet-forming regions (similar to 1AU), where solar particle fluxes were sufficiently low to avoid substantial in-situ irradiation of CAIs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据