4.4 Article

The Role of Mixed Graphene/Carbon Nanotubes on the Coating Performance of G/CNTs/Epoxy Resin Nanocomposites

期刊

出版社

ESG
DOI: 10.20964/2016.09.13

关键词

Epoxy resin; Mixed Graphene/Carbon nanotubes; Coating performance; Electrochemical impedance

资金

  1. Center of Excellence for Advanced Materials Research (CEAMR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah [CEAMR-SG-7-437]
  2. CEAMR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is no doubt that, epoxy resin is one of the most important materials that has been widely used in coating technology. The present work is aimed to fabricate a new series of epoxy resin nanocomposites in the form of G/CNTs/EPY1-4 using simple dissolution method and ultrasonic assistance. The expected nanocomposites have been fabricated using 10% loading of different mixed ratios from G/CNTs. Four different G/CNTs mixed ratios were used 20/80%, 40/60%, 60/40%, and 80/20%. The structure of the G/CNT/EPY1-4 nanocomposites has been investigated and confirmed by normal characterization techniques including: X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Differential Thermal gravimetry (DTG) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). T-25 and T-50 values for G/CNT/EPY1-4 nanocomposites were slightly higher than elegant epoxy. R-500 values for the fabricated materials were in the range of 8.98-10.04%. Furthermore, the role of mixed G/CNTs on the coating properties of epoxy resin was determined using electrochemical impedance and technique. The coating resistance of epoxy composites in the form of G/CNT/EPY1-4 was larger than that observed for elegant epoxy coating. G/CNT/EPY3 and G/CNT/EPY1 showed highest and the lowest coating impedance values respectively. In addition to that, the water sorption technique has been used as a complementary method for such coating behaviour. The water uptake was efficiently decreased in all the formulations compared to the epoxy due to the presence of G/CNTs reinforcing agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据