4.8 Article

Increasing co-occurrence of fine particulate matter and ground-level ozone extremes in the western United States

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi9386

关键词

-

资金

  1. Washington State University New Faculty Seed Grant
  2. Institute of the Environment and Sustainability at the University of California, Los Angeles
  3. Center for Climate and Weather Extremes at the National Center for Atmospheric Research
  4. Nature Conservancy of California
  5. NOAA
  6. CIRES [NA17OAR4320101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wildfires and meteorological conditions have a significant impact on the co-occurrence of PM2.5 and ground-level ozone in the western US. The frequency and intensity of these co-occurrences have increased over the past two decades, leading to an increase in population exposure to harmful air pollutants. The extent of co-occurrence is linked to atmospheric ridging patterns and the extent of extreme heat and wildfires.
Wildfires and meteorological conditions influence the co-occurrence of multiple harmful air pollutants including fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ground-level ozone. We examine the spatiotemporal characteristics of PM2.5/ozone co-occurrences and associated population exposure in the western United States (US). The frequency, spatial extent, and temporal persistence of extreme PM2.5/ozone co-occurrences have increased significantly between 2001 and 2020, increasing annual population exposure to multiple harmful air pollutants by similar to 25 million person-days/year. Using a clustering methodology to characterize daily weather patterns, we identify significant increases in atmospheric ridging patterns conducive to widespread PM2.5/ozone co-occurrences and population exposure. We further link the spatial extent of co-occurrence to the extent of extreme heat and wildfires. Our results suggest an increasing potential for co-occurring air pollution episodes in the western US with continued climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据