4.8 Article

Spiral self-assembly of lamellar micelles into multi-shelled hollow nanospheres with unique chiral architecture

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 45, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi7403

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFE0201701, 2018YFA0209401]
  2. NSFC of China [22088101, 21733003, 21975050]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19JC1410700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-shelled mesoporous carbon nanospheres were synthesized using a spiral self-assembly strategy, featuring diverse pore structures achieved through continuous adjustment of surfactant amphiphilicity. These carbon nanospheres exhibit excellent electrochemical performance for potassium-ion storage.
Functional carbon nanospheres are exceptionally useful, yet controllable synthesis of them with well-defined porosity and complex multi-shelled nanostructure remains challenging. Here, we report a lamellar micelle spiral self-assembly strategy to synthesize multi-shelled mesoporous carbon nanospheres with unique chirality. This synthesis features the introduction of shearing flow to drive the spiral self-assembly, which is different from conventional chiral templating methods. Furthermore, a continuous adjustment in the amphipathicity of surfactants can cause the packing parameter changes, namely, micellar structure transformations, resulting in diverse pore structures from single-porous, to radial orientated, to flower-like, and to multi-shelled configurations. The self-supported spiral architecture of these multi-shelled carbon nanospheres, in combination with their high surface area (similar to 530 m(2) g(-1)), abundant nitrogen content (similar to 6.2 weight %), and plentiful mesopores (similar to 2.5 nm), affords them excellent electrochemical performance for potassium-ion storage. This simple but powerful micelle-directed self-assembly strategy offers inspiration for future nanostructure design of functional materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据