4.6 Article

Pressure-tailored lithium deposition and dissolution in lithium metal batteries

期刊

NATURE ENERGY
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 987-994

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-021-00917-3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a high-density Li deposition technique achieved by controlling uniaxial stack pressure to improve the performance of lithium metal batteries, along with proposing a Li morphology testing protocol to maintain the ideal Li deposition morphology. The critical role of stack pressure on Li nucleation, growth, and dissolution processes is elucidated, highlighting the importance of precise control of Li deposition and dissolution.
Unregulated lithium (Li) growth is the major cause of low Coulombic efficiency, short cycle life and safety hazards for rechargeable Li metal batteries. Strategies that aim to achieve large granular Li deposits have been extensively explored, and yet it remains a challenge to achieve the ideal Li deposits, which consist of large Li particles that are seamlessly packed on the electrode and can be reversibly deposited and stripped. Here we report a dense Li deposition (99.49% electrode density) with an ideal columnar structure that is achieved by controlling the uniaxial stack pressure during battery operation. Using multiscale characterization and simulation, we elucidate the critical role of stack pressure on Li nucleation, growth and dissolution processes and propose a Li-reservoir-testing protocol to maintain the ideal Li morphology during extended cycling. The precise manipulation of Li deposition and dissolution is a critical step to enable fast charging and a low-temperature operation for Li metal batteries. Li electrodeposition is a fundamental process in Li metal batteries and its reversibility is crucial for battery operation. The authors investigate the effects of stack pressure on Li deposition and associated processes and discuss strategies for achieving dense Li deposits and practical Li metal batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据