4.4 Article

A Valuable Method for the Synthesis of 2-Benzylchromones: A Comparative Evaluation of Both Conventional and Microwave-Assisted Synthesis

期刊

CHEMISTRYSELECT
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/slct.202103560

关键词

2-Benzoylchromones; 2-Benzylchromones; Chromones; Claisen condensation; Oxygen heterocycles; Microwave synthesis

资金

  1. PT national funds (FCT/MCTES, Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia and Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior) [UIDB/50006/2020]
  2. FCT [PD/BD/135103/2017]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/135103/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromones, a naturally occurring class of compounds widely distributed in nature, have emerged as a privileged scaffold in medicinal chemistry due to their unique structural features, diverse biological activities, and pharmacological properties. Researchers have successfully synthesized 2-benzylchromones through both conventional and microwave-assisted methods.
Chromones (4H-chromen-4-ones) contemplate a naturally occurring class of compounds widely distributed in Nature, particularly in plants. This singular ring system has emerged as a privileged scaffold in medicinal chemistry, mainly due to its unique structural features, diverse biological activities, and pharmacological properties. Throughout the past few years, our efforts have been focused on synthesizing a series of 2-benzylchromones through a Claisen condensation, using 2'-hydroxyacetophenones and ethyl 2-phenylacetates. However, the extended periods of reaction necessary for the synthesis of 2-benzylchromones led to the search for an alternative. Thus, microwave irradiation emerged as a suitable approach to obtain these chromones in shorter reaction times and with similar or even improved synthetic yields. Our work demonstrates that it is possible to synthesize 2-benzylchromones through both conventional and microwave-assisted synthesis, favoring the use of microwave irradiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据