4.2 Article

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in lipopolysaccharide-induced THP-1 cells of coumarins from the bark of Hesperethusa crenulata R.

期刊

APPLIED BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13765-021-00665-8

关键词

Antioxidant capacity; Hesperethusa crenulata R.; Methylpeucedanol; Peucedanol; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

资金

  1. Korea Ministry of SMEs [S2605014]
  2. Korea Ministry of Startups in 2018 [S2605014]
  3. Korea Technology & Information Promotion Agency for SMEs (TIPA) [S2605014] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three coumarins were isolated from the bark of Thanakha tree, showing antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, indicating their potential as cosmetic ingredients.
All parts of Thanakha (Hesperethusa crenulata R.) have been used as traditional skin care herbal material in Myanmar. In this study, coumarins from H. crenulata R. bark were isolated through solvent extraction, systematic solvent fractionation, and repeated column chromatography. Spectroscopic analyses using ESI-MS, 1D NMR (1H and 13C), 2D NMR (gHSQC and gHMBC), specific rotation, circular dichroism, and IR spectrometry revealed three coumarins 2R-7-hydroxy-8-(2,3-dihydroxy-3-methylbutyl)-coumarin (compound 1), peucedanol (compound 2), and methylpeucedanol (compound 3), which were first isolated from Thanakha tree. Antioxidant capacities of three coumarins decreased as follows: compound 2 > compound 3 > compound 1. Treatments of lipopolysaccharide-induced THP-1 human monocytic cells with compounds 2 and 3 at 378.8 mu M and 359.7 mu M inhibited tumor necrosis factor-a production by approximately 32.7% and 13.3%, respectively, compared with the negative control. In summary, these results suggest that Thanakha bark extracts can be used as a potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory source for cosmetic ingredients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据