4.3 Article

Longitudinal evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient values as a predictor of Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance reclassification

期刊

ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 814-826

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03372-6

关键词

Prostate cancer; Active surveillance; Reclassification; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Apparent diffusion coefficient

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the ADC parameters at the second MRI and the changes in ADC parameters from baseline to the second MRI may be effective factors in distinguishing between PRIAS non-reclassification and reclassification groups during active surveillance of prostate cancer.
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters in distinguishing between Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) non-reclassification and reclassification groups during active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer. Methods We included 55 patients who fulfilled the PRIAS criteria and underwent >= 2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging with an interval of <= 3 years between baseline and second MRI. A mono-exponential fitting model was used to automatically create ADC maps with minimum b-values of 0 and maximum of 2000 s/mm(2). For detectable lesions on ADC maps, the lesions were manually segmented on each slice of the ADC maps. For undetectable lesions, the corresponding normal-appearing zone of the lobe on each slice of ADC maps was segmented. The ADC data for each slice were summed to obtain the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile ADC values of the histogram at baseline and second MRI. These ADC parameters at baseline and second MRI, and the changes of ADC parameters from baseline to second MRI were compared between PRIAS non-reclassification and reclassification groups. Results The PRIAS reclassification group had significantly lower 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile ADC values at second MRI compared to the non-reclassification group. The non-reclassification group had significantly lower changes in ADC values in these percentiles compared to the reclassification group. Conclusion The ADC parameters at second MRI and the changes from baseline to second MRI may be effective distinguishing factors between PRIAS non-reclassification and reclassification groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据