4.6 Article

Mixing Matters: Nanoscale Heterogeneity and Stability in Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 471-480

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02338

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Solar Energy Technology Office (SETO) of the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) [DE-AC36-08-GO28308]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the impact of nanoscale compositional heterogeneity on the long-term stability of MHP solar cells using mixed A-site FA(0.83)Cs(0.17)PbI(3), and reveals that thermal annealing conditions during film processing can influence nan-scale compositional heterogeneity, with potential to improve device performance stability.
The structural stability of the metal halide perovskite (MHP) absorber material is crucial for the long-term solar cell stability in this thin-film photovoltaic technology. Here, we use mixed A-site FA(0.83)Cs(0.17)PbI(3) to demonstrate that nanoscale compositional heterogeneity can serve as initiation sites for more macroscale, irreversible phase segregation, which causes device performance degradation. Probing compositional heterogeneity on length scales that has not been detected with conventional characterization techniques, we analyze the tetragonal to cubic phase transition behavior to indirectly determine the level of nanoscale compositional heterogeneity in the initial films. Further, we show that the thermal annealing conditions of the MHP layer during film processing influence the initial nanoscale compositional heterogeneity, and changing these processing conditions can be used to improve the device performance stability. The insights into structural degradation mechanisms initiated by nanoscale compositional heterogeneity and the proposed mitigation strategies will help guide the way toward long-term stable MHP solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据