4.7 Article

Pumped hydro energy storage arbitrage in the day-ahead market in smart grid using stochastic p-robust optimization method

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103274

关键词

Pumped hydro energy storage; Stochastic p-robust optimization; Bidding strategy; Offering strategy; Maximum relative regret

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a new stochastic p-robust optimization method, the financial risks of day-ahead price uncertainty for pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) can be managed effectively. By reducing the robustness parameter, both profit and maximum relative regret decrease, showing that a small sacrifice in profit can significantly reduce the maximum relative regret. This approach ensures both profitability and robustness of PHES in the electricity market.
Individual operation of pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) as large-scale energy storage needs the bidding and offering curves to participate, as a prosumer, in the day-ahead electricity market. Therefore, in this paper, by taking advantage of stochastic and robust optimization, a new stochastic p-robust optimization (SPRO) method is proposed to deal with the financial risks of the day-ahead price uncertainty. The proposed method compares the profit of PHES with the relative regret to get a risk-controlled strategy. According to obtained results, reducing the robustness parameter (p) from the p=+infinity to p=0.21, the profit, and the maximum relative regret are reduced by $ 2611 and 15.02 %, respectively. In other words, with a 19.11 % decline in profit, the maximum amount of relative regret decreased by 41.30 %. Therefore, it can be shown that by a few reductions in profit, the maximum amount of relative regret decreases significantly. At the same time, the robustness of PHES is guaranteed against the day-ahead market price uncertainty. Finally, the risk-based bidding and offering curves are derived using the results of the proposed SPRO method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据