4.7 Article

A Temperature & Humidity Setback Demand Response Strategy for HVAC Systems

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103393

关键词

HVAC; Demand response; Peak shedding; Energy saving; Thermal comfort; Temperature & humidity setback

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808238]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a temperature & humidity (T&H) setback strategy for HVAC systems, which can effectively reduce both sensible and latent cooling loads, with an energy saving rate of up to 39.0%. The T&H strategy performs better in buildings with lower sensible or higher latent loads, enhancing the flexibility of buildings during demand response periods.
Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system plays a significant role in demand response (DR) to reduce the peak load of the grid. Conventionally, only the sensible load is reduced by increasing the indoor temperature during DR periods and the latent load is rarely concerned. This study proposes a temperature & humidity (T&H) setback strategy for HVAC systems to reduce both the sensible and latent cooling loads by adjusting the supply air temperature and chilled water supply temperature simultaneously. The performance of the T&H setback strategy is analyzed from the perspectives of peak shedding, energy saving and indoor thermal comfort and compared with the common temperature setback strategy. The impact of weather conditions and occupant densities on the performance of T&H strategy is assessed. Results show that the energy saving of the HVAC system under the T&H setback strategy can be up to 39.0% and peak shedding can be increased to 37.1%, which are both higher compared with the temperature setback strategy. The peak shedding and energy saving of the T&H setback strategy is larger when the buildings have lower sensible or higher latent load. The T&H strategy can improve the flexibility of buildings during DR periods effectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据