4.7 Article

Mitigation co-benefits of climate change adaptation: A case-study analysis of eight cities

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103563

关键词

Climate change adaptation; Cities; Urban climate policy; Co-benefits; Policy formation; City governance

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/P022820/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research explores the approaches taken by eight cities in planning for mitigation co-benefits of adaptation strategies. The research analyses and compares the approaches set out in city adaptation plans, identifies common barriers faced by cities, and outlines three actions as recommendations for cities. The research highlights the importance of delivering mitigation co-benefits of adaptation actions and identifies certain types of co-benefits that are commonly utilized by cities.
This research explores the approaches eight cities - Durban, Cape Town, London, Manchester, Surat, Indore, Montreal, and Vancouver - are taking to plan for mitigation co-benefits of adaptation strategies. The approaches set out in city adaptation plans are analysed and compared to provide insight into the uptake of mitigation co benefits in terms of the extent to which they are strategically planned for and the types of measures utilised. The research also identifies common barriers cities face that prevent the implementation of co-benefit approaches. Finally, drawing on approaches taken by the cities that comprehensively plan for adaptation-mitigation co benefits, three actions are outlined to serve as recommendations for cities to help catalyse the uptake of co benefits and avoid trade-offs in adaptation planning. Delivering mitigation co-benefits of adaptation actions was a strategic aim of five of eight cities. Four of these cities comprehensively identified mitigation co-benefits of planned adaptation measures. Certain types of co benefits were more commonly utilised by cities, such as ecosystem-based strategies and building design measures. The alignment of adaptation and development goals is a more common aim than the alignment of adaptation and mitigation. Incentives to meet multiple policy priorities, reduce costs, and increase resource efficiency can deliver co-benefit approaches that cover adaptation, mitigation, and development goals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据