4.7 Article

A solar-driven 5th generation district heating and cooling network with ground-source heat pumps: a thermo-economic analysis

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103438

关键词

5th generation district heat and cool network; bidirectional low temperature network; ground heat pumps; photovoltaic; renewable energy district

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
  2. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (Ramon y Cajal Programme) [RYC-2016-20971]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research presents a 5th generation bidirectional heating/cooling network that reduces primary energy consumption and CO2 emissions, with suggestions to address high costs and inadequate energy storage.
District Heating and Cooling is considered an efficient solution to address the thermal energy demand of the building sector and reduce its environmental impact. In this paper, a 5th generation bidirectional heating/cooling network is designed and modelled. The network is coupled with water-to-water heat pumps, ground heat pumps and a photovoltaic field and is designed to meet the energy requirements of a 50-building district in the city of Legane ' s (Madrid). All components are modelled in TRNSYS 18. The studied network achieves a primary energy saving index of 64% and reduces the CO2 emissions by 76% relative to the current situation. The economic analysis of the system results in the relatively long payback period of 33 years, mainly due to the high costs of excavation and the installation of the heat pumps and pipes. With the current design, the photovoltaic field meets only 30% of the electricity demand of the district. However, additional energy storage could help align the power production with the actual power demand better and avoid grid balancing issues. The inclusion of other types of thermal energy consumers would also enhance the performance of the network by increasing the simultaneity between cooling and heating demands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据