4.6 Article

Wear Behavior of Borided Cold-Rolled High Manganese Steel

期刊

COATINGS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings11101207

关键词

boriding; high manganese steel; wear; diffusion kinetic; adhesion test

资金

  1. Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Karabuk University [FDK-2020-2114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel high-manganese steel (HMS) underwent pack boriding process at different temperatures and durations resulting in saw-tooth morphology similar to low alloy steels, significant increase in thickness and hardness of the boride layer, and improved wear resistance and service life of the components. The study also revealed the presence of silicon-rich zones and identified the formation mechanism as compact transfer of silicones (CTS).
In this study, a novel high-manganese steel (HMS) was borided at 850, 900 and 950 degrees C for 2, 4, and 6 h by the pack boriding process. Contrary to previous literature, borided HMS uncommonly exhibited saw-tooth morphology like low alloy steels, and manganese enhanced the boron diffusion. Another striking analysis is that the egg-shell effect did not occur. The present study demonstrated the silicon-rich zone for the first time in the literature by EDX mapping. Moreover, the formation mechanism of silicon-rich zones was explained and termed as compact transfer of silicones (CTS) . XRD analysis showed the existence of FeB, Fe2B, MnB and SiC phases. The boriding time and temperature increased the thickness of the boride layer from 31.41 mu m to 117.65 mu m. The hardness of the borided layer ranged from 1120 to 1915 HV0.05. The activation energy of borided HMS was found to be a very low result compared to high alloy steel investigated in the literature. The Daimler-Benz Rockwell-C adhesion test showed that adhesions of borided HMS surfaces are sufficient. The dry sliding wear tests showed that boriding treatment increased the wear resistance of untreated HMS by 5 times. The present study revealed that the boriding process extended the service life of HMS components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据