4.6 Review

Arsenic Removal from Contaminated Water Using Natural Adsorbents: A Review

期刊

COATINGS
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings11111407

关键词

adsorption; arsenic; natural adsorbents

资金

  1. Technology Innovation Center for Land Engineering and Human Settlements
  2. Shaanxi Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd.
  3. Xi'an Jiaotong University [201912131]
  4. Science technology Project of Yulin [YF-2020-007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenic contamination in water bodies, especially groundwater, has become a widespread issue in recent decades. Traditional methods for arsenic removal are costly and produce sludge, limiting their application in less developed areas. The use of adsorbents derived from natural materials is a more cost-effective approach for arsenic removal.
More than 170 million individuals have been influenced by arsenic (As) because of the ingestion of As-polluted groundwater. The presence of As in water bodies, particularly groundwater, has been found to become a widespread issue in the past few decades. Because arsenic causes extreme wellbeing impacts, even at a low concentration in drinking water, the innovations of As removal from contaminated water are of significant importance. Traditional strategies, for example, reverse osmosis, ion exchange, and electro-dialysis are generally utilized for the remediation of As-polluted water; however, the high cost and/or sludge production restricts their application in less-developed areas. The utilization of adsorbents acquired from natural materials has been explored as an alternative for the costly techniques for As removal. This paper aims to review the past and current developments in using naturals adsorbents or modified natural materials for arsenic removal and show the different parameters, which may influence the As removal effectiveness of the natural adsorbent, such as contact time, adsorbent dosage, flow rate, pH, reusability, temperature, and influence of others ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据