4.6 Article

The Effect of Gaseous Ozone and Moringa Leaf-Carboxymethyl Cellulose Edible Coating on Antioxidant Activity and Biochemical Properties of 'Keitt' Mango Fruit

期刊

COATINGS
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings11111406

关键词

mango fruit; sugars; phenolics; antioxidants; edible coating; ozone

资金

  1. National Research Foundation [CSUR: 105978]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the combination of EC and O-3 enhanced the antioxidants of mango fruit, delayed fruit softening, and reduced the accumulation of total sugars in the fruit.
This study evaluated the effect of edible coating and gaseous ozone on the antioxidant activities and biochemical properties of mango fruit. Mango fruit (cv. Keitt) were coated with moringa leaf extract and carboxymethyl cellulose (EC) before exposure to ozone (0.25 ppm). Gaseous ozone (O-3) was administered intermittently for 24 or 36 h, and the control fruit were untreated. The fruit were stored at 10 & DEG;C for twenty-one days, then ripened at ambient temperature for seven days. The parameters measured were ascorbic acid, lipid peroxidation, phenolic content, total sugars, and antioxidant capacity (FRAP and DPPH). At the end of storage, the EC + O-3 (36 h) had high phenolic content: 175.02 mu g GEA/g DM compared to 151.87 mu g GEA/g DM and 138.98 mu g GEA/g DM for the O-3 (24 h) and untreated fruit, respectively. Moreover, the combination of the EC and O-3 (36 h) had a higher effect (p < 0.05) on preserving the antioxidant capacity of the mangoes. The EC + O-3 (24 h) and EC significantly delayed fruit softening and maintained membrane integrity. Furthermore, the fruit treated with the EC reduced the accumulation of reducing (7.61 mg/mL) and total sugars (8.81 mg/mL) compared to the control treatment, which had a concentration of 12.74 mg/mL and 13.78 mg/mL, respectively. These findings demonstrate that EC combined with gaseous O-3 enhanced the antioxidants of mango fruit during storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据