4.6 Article

Comparison between the kinematics for kangaroo rat hopping on a solid versus sand surface

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211491

关键词

locomotion; rotatory treadmill; substrates

资金

  1. Army Research Office [66554-EG]
  2. National Science Foundation [1553550]
  3. Auvil Scholarship
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1553550] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the hopping behavior of desert kangaroo rats on solid and granular substrates. The results show that the kinematics of the hop are similar on both types of substrates, despite the fact that sand absorbs mechanical energy. The combination of sand properties, toe-print area, and kangaroo rat weight likely contribute to this similarity.
In their natural habitats, animals move on a variety of substrates, ranging from solid surfaces to those that yield and flow (e.g. sand). These substrates impose different mechanical demands on the musculoskeletal system and may therefore elicit different locomotion patterns. The goal of this study is to compare bipedal hopping by desert kangaroo rats (Dipodomys deserti) on a solid versus granular substrate under speed-controlled conditions. To accomplish this goal, we developed a rotary treadmill, which is able to have different substrates or uneven surfaces. We video recorded six kangaroo rats hopping on a solid surface versus sand at the same speed (1.8 m s(-1)) and quantified the differences in the hopping kinematics between the two substrates. We found no significant differences in the hop period, hop length or duty cycle, showing that the gross kinematics on the two substrates were similar. This similarity was surprising given that sand is a substrate that absorbs mechanical energy. Measurements of the penetration resistance of the sand showed that the combination of the sand properties, toe-print area and kangaroo rat weight was probably the reason for the similarity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据