4.5 Article

Yolk-Shell Sb2S3@C Hollow Microspheres with Controllable Interiors for High Space Utilization and Structural Stability of Na-Storage

期刊

CHEMNANOMAT
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cnma.202100515

关键词

antimony sulfide; anode; sodium ion batteries; yolk-shell; hollow

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21875156, 21875154]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In evaluating the practical application of electrode materials in sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), factors such as structural stability, space utilization, and appropriate working potentials are crucial. This study demonstrates the preparation of a novel Sb2S3@carbon composite with unique and controllable hollow microspherical structures. The yolk-shell structure exhibits higher performance in terms of capacity, cycling stability, and charge/discharge capabilities compared to the simple hollow structure.
Structural stability, space utilization and appropriate working potentials are the most crucial parameters for evaluating the practical application of various electrode materials in sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). To obtain a high-performance anode material for SIBs, a novel Sb2S3@carbon composite with unique and controllable hollow microspherical structures is prepared through a facile and large-scalable approach. By adjusting the precursor concentrations, yolk-shell and simple hollow Sb2S3@carbon microspheres are obtained respectively. The formation mechanisms of different hollow interiors are discussed. It is found that simple hollow Sb2S3@carbon microspheres tend to collapse into fragments when being used as the anode materials of SIBs, leading to severe electrolyte decomposition and high charge-transfer resistance. In contrast, yolk-shell Sb2S3@carbon not only possesses high space utilization, but also preserves the microspherical structure well after long-term sodiation/desodiation reactions, endowing it with high capacity, good cycling stability, and fast charge/discharge capability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据