4.5 Article

Design of Ni-substituted La2(CeZrNi)2O7 Pyrochlore Catalysts for Methane Dry Reforming

期刊

CHEMNANOMAT
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cnma.202100422

关键词

catalyst; deactivation; oxygen vacancy; pyrochlore

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21908236]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0202802]
  3. Jupeng Bio Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully altered the structural order of the catalysts by adjusting the Zr/Ce ratio, leading to different properties and compositions of surface oxygen species. Catalysts with more oxygen vacancies displayed better coke resistance. Among them, LNZ3C1 exhibited the highest activity, stability, and carbon deposition resistance.
Ni-based catalysts for dry reforming of methane (DRM) are prone to suffer from deactivation caused by carbon deposition and sintering. Pyrochlore (typically A(2)B(2)O(7)) is a thermostable material with substantial redox capacity, which makes it suitable as a support for Ni-based DRM catalysts. Here we demonstrated that by adjusting the Zr/Ce ratio in the B-site of the La-2(CeZrNi)(2)O-7 (10 wt.% Ni loading), its structural order could be significantly altered. With decreasing Zr/Ce ratio, the structure of the catalysts became less ordered with a phase transformation from pyrochlore (La2Zr2O7) to defective fluorite (La2Ce2O7). Meanwhile, a second phase La2NiZrO6/LaNiO3 other than pyrochlore was formed for each sample. By tuning the structure, samples presented different properties and XPS results illustrated that the compositions of the surface oxygen species of samples were significantly different. Catalysts possessing more oxygen vacancies displayed evidently enhanced coke resistance. Among all five catalysts, LNZ3C1 exhibited the highest activity, stability and carbon deposition resistance, which could be attributed to the most oxygen vacancies, the strongest nickel-carrier interaction, and the best particle size distribution of it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据