4.5 Article

In-Situ Lattice Tunnel Intercalation of Vanadium Pentoxide for Improving Long-Term Performance of Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries

期刊

CHEMNANOMAT
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cnma.202200025

关键词

V2O5; polyaniline; intercalation; pseudocapacitance; magnesium batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [5180103022109044]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A030310571]
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Founds for the Young Scholars [BK20190978, BK20191026]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, China [22ZR1418500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile and scalable technique for tailoring the (001) spacing of V2O5 by in-situ polyaniline polymerization is established, yielding a porous V2O5/polyaniline composite as the anode for rechargeable magnesium batteries. The composite material, with increased interlayer spacing and improved ion diffusion, demonstrates outstanding electrochemical performance and long-term cycling stability.
Layered V2O5 is a promising and versatile cathode for rechargeable magnesium batteries (RMBs), but its narrow interlayer spacing makes rapid Mg2+ diffusion difficult, resulting in poor electrochemical performance. Herein, a facile and scalable technique is established for tailoring the (001) spacing of V2O5 by in-situ polyaniline polymerization. The intercalated polyaniline molecules operate as pillars in the V2O5 interlayer, providing plentiful storage sites as well as improved cation diffusivities of Mg ion. As expected, by using V2O5/polyaniline as the cathode (anode: Mg metal), a high specific capacity of 361 mAh g(-1) with charging/discharging current density of 20 mA g(-1) can be achieved for RMBs. Besides, V2O5/polyaniline electrode shows favorable rate capability with 103 mAh g(-1) at 500 mA g(-1) (500 cycles) and ultra long-term cycling performance after 5000 cycles. Ex situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy is used to study the magnesium storage mechanism of the V2O5/polyaniline electrode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据