4.7 Review

Cucurbitaceae genome evolution, gene function, and molecular breeding

期刊

HORTICULTURE RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhab057

关键词

-

资金

  1. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z191100008619004, Z191100004019010]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772022, 32072284]
  3. Key Project 'Science and Technology Boost the Economy 2020', China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA [CARS-23]
  4. Special innovation ability construction fund of Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences [20200427, 20210437]
  5. Collaborative innovation center of Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences [201915]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article summarizes the genome sequence information, evolutionary relationships, and functional genes associated with important agronomic traits of Cucurbitaceae species. The progress of molecular breeding in cucurbit crops and the potential applications of Cucurbitaceae genome information are also discussed.
Cucurbitaceae is one of the most genetically diverse plant families in the world. Many of them are important vegetables or medicinal plants and are widely distributed worldwide. The rapid development of sequencing technologies and bioinformatic algorithms has enabled the generation of genome sequences of numerous important Cucurbitaceae species. This has greatly facilitated research on gene identification, genome evolution, genetic variation, and molecular breeding of cucurbit crops. So far, genome sequences of 18 different cucurbit species belonging to tribes Benincaseae, Cucurbiteae, Sicyoeae, Momordiceae, and Siraitieae have been deciphered. This review summarizes the genome sequence information, evolutionary relationships, and functional genes associated with important agronomic traits (e.g. fruit quality). The progress of molecular breeding in cucurbit crops and prospects for future applications of Cucurbitaceae genome information are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据