4.7 Article

Small RNA populations reflect the complex dialogue established between heterograft partners in grapevine

期刊

HORTICULTURE RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhab067

关键词

-

资金

  1. Conseil Interprofessionnel du Vin de Bordeaux [28325]
  2. France-AgriMer
  3. Region Nouvelle Aquitaine [22001128 EPISTORE]
  4. Labex Cote (METDRY)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the populations of small RNAs in homo and heterografts were analyzed, and the possible exchange of small RNAs between heterograft partners was explored by taking advantage of sequence differences in their genomes. It was found that the type of grafting and genotype have significant effects on small RNA populations. Additionally, bilateral exchanges of small RNAs, especially short interfering RNAs, were observed in heterografts with a preference for transfer from scions to rootstocks. Overall, these findings suggest that small RNAs may play an important role in the phenotype modifications observed in heterografts.
Grafting is an ancient method that has been intensively used for the clonal propagation of vegetables and woody trees. Despite its importance in agriculture the physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypic changes of plants following grafting are still poorly understood. In the present study, we analyse the populations of small RNAs in homo and heterografts and take advantage of the sequence differences in the genomes of heterograft partners to analyse the possible exchange of small RNAs. We demonstrate that the type of grafting per se dramatically influences the small RNA populations independently of genotypes but also show genotype specific effects. In addition, we demonstrate that bilateral exchanges of small RNAs, mainly short interfering RNAs, may occur in heterograft with the preferential transfer of small RNAs from the scion to the rootstock. Altogether, the results suggest that small RNAs may have an important role in the phenotype modifications observed in heterografts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据