4.6 Article

Reconstructing Macroevolutionary Patterns in Avian MHC Architecture With Genomic Data

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.823686

关键词

MHC architecture; MHC gene structure; avian MHC; macroevolutionary; third-generation sequencing genome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the macroevolutionary patterns in the avian Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) architecture and provides evidence for important transitions in the genomic arrangement of the MHC region during bird evolution.
The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) is a hyper-polymorphic genomic region, which forms a part of the vertebrate adaptive immune system and is crucial for intra- and extra-cellular pathogen recognition (MHC-I and MHC-IIA/B, respectively). Although recent advancements in high-throughput sequencing methods sparked research on the MHC in non-model species, the evolutionary history of MHC gene structure is still poorly understood in birds. Here, to explore macroevolutionary patterns in the avian MHC architecture, we retrieved contigs with antigen-presenting MHC and MHC-related genes from available genomes based on third-generation sequencing. We identified: 1) an ancestral avian MHC architecture with compact size and tight linkage between MHC-I, MHC-IIA/IIB and MHC-related genes; 2) three major patterns of MHC-IIA/IIB unit organization in different avian lineages; and 3) lineage-specific gene translocation events (e.g., separation of the antigen-processing TAP genes from the MHC-I region in passerines), and 4) the presence of a single MHC-IIA gene copy in most taxa, showing evidence of strong purifying selection (low dN/dS ratio and low number of positively selected sites). Our study reveals long-term macroevolutionary patterns in the avian MHC architecture and provides the first evidence of important transitions in the genomic arrangement of the MHC region over the last 100 million years of bird evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据