4.7 Article

ScanSAT: Unlocking Static and Dynamic Scan Obfuscation

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TETC.2019.2940750

关键词

Logic gates; Testing; Integrated circuit modeling; Companies; IP networks; Outsourcing; Obfuscated scan chains; scan obfuscation; scan locking; SAT attack; logic locking

资金

  1. Khalifa University of Science and Technology [RC2-2018-020]
  2. New York University Abu Dhabi Center for Cybersecurity
  3. Intel Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses scan chain obfuscation technique and introduces an attack method called ScanSAT that can break both static and dynamic scan obfuscation schemes with a 100% success rate. The attack is effective even for large key sizes and in the presence of scan compression.
While financially advantageous, outsourcing key steps, such as testing, to potentially untrusted Outsourced Assembly and Test (OSAT) companies may pose a risk of compromising on-chip assets. Obfuscation of scan chains is a technique that hides the actual scan data from the untrusted testers; logic inserted between the scan cells, driven by a secret key, hides the transformation functions that map the scan-in stimulus (scan-out response) and the delivered scan pattern (captured response). While static scan obfuscation utilizes the same secret key, and thus, the same secret transformation functions throughout the lifetime of the chip, dynamic scan obfuscation updates the key periodically. In this paper, we propose ScanSAT: an attack that transforms a scan obfuscated circuit to its logic-locked version and applies the Boolean satisfiability (SAT) based attack, thereby extracting the secret key. We implement our attack, apply on representative scan obfuscation techniques, and show that ScanSAT can break both static and dynamic scan obfuscation schemes with 100 percent success rate. Moreover, ScanSAT is effective even for large key sizes and in the presence of scan compression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据