4.6 Article

Multielement Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Italian Extra-Virgin Olive Oils

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.769620

关键词

authenticity; chemometrics; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; olive oil; statistical analysis; trace elements; traceability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized multielement analysis and chemometric tools to characterize 237 extra-virgin olive oil samples from 15 regions of Italy, and found that chemometric methods coupled with ICP-MS have the potential to discriminate and characterize the different types of EVOO.
Food product safety and quality are closely related to the elemental composition of food. This study combined multielement analysis and chemometric tools to characterize 237 extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO) samples from 15 regions of Italy, and to verify the possibility of discriminating them according to different quality factors, such as varietal or geographical origin or whether they were organically or traditionally produced. Some elements have antioxidant properties, while others are toxic to humans or can promote oxidative degradation of EVOO samples. In particular, the antioxidant activity of oils' hydrophilic fraction was estimated and the concentrations of 45 elements were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). At first, univariate and multivariate analyses of variance were used to compare the element concentrations, and statistically significant differences were found among samples from different regions. Successively, discriminant classification approaches were used to build a model for EVOO authentication, considering, in turn, various possible categorizations. The results have indicated that chemometric methods coupled with ICP-MS have the potential to discriminate and characterize the different types of EVOO, and to provide typical elemental fingerprints of the various categories of samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据